Thursday, December 27, 2018

Highest Grossing Living Visual Artists

(reflecting on semester end aloud over dinner) 




Me: (fumbling over words) There was name dropping.  A lot of it.  That was one of my favorite parts. The profs told us about so many artists I'd never heard of before. Not household names, but big in the art world.  Its not about the money. 

Friend (who may or may not be named "Joe"): (earestly and befuddledly) Why are living artists selling their work for millions of dollars--they do right?

Me: (nothing. Conversation got shifted.  But! ...later thought, what is the connection of the high grossers and my burgeoning understanding?  Herein, I enumerate the following and will make notable additions and probably some interpolated commentary, forthcomingly)

From Huffington Post August, 2015

Gerhard Richter -- total revenue of 200 million 

Jeff Koons -- Balloon Dog (Orange)  $58.4 million at Christie’s in 2013.

Jasper Johns   Flag (1983) $36 million

Ed Ruscha -- Ruscha lands in the third spot on our list with a $30 million sale of his text painting Smash.

Christopher Wool - Untitled (Riot)(1990) sold for $29.9 million in 2011

Robert Ryman - (1980) painting Bridge for $20.6 million, Untitled (1961) for $15 million, and Link (2002) $11.4 million

Brice Marsden - The Attended (1996) 10.9 million
Cady Noland - Bluewald (1989) 9.8 million

Damien Hearst - 

Sunflowers?




Saturday, December 15, 2018

End of Semester Reviews


December 15

     Yesterday, after reviews were finished, most of my small class convened informally in our group studio to chill and discuss.  We were joined by a second year student who, being experienced in the program, has been from day one, a great source of information and insight.  When he asked me what I thought of the first semester, I responded that whatever I am going to get from this program will be something different than what I was expecting.  He raised his brows and pointed a knowing finger in my direction, responding, "You are exactly right."

     So the question remains: What will that be?  When Archie asked me at the beginning of the semester what my expectations were, I responded that I want to be a better artist.  What does that mean to me?  Ultimately, it means joy, fraternity, and direction.  Joy is flow.  Joy is being lost in what you are doing where that moment is an end unto itself.  Making art, drawing lines, setting goals and accomplishing them, learning techniques, playing....these have sustained me throughout my wildly challenging life.  I wish to cultivate my practice so that it can grow with me as I become an older person with changing concerns and capabilities.  I would like more people in my life with whom I share these.  Historically, the presence of people to whom I can look up to who are willing to help me perceive my own strengths and weaknesses have been pivotal in my getting this far, but I cannot say I have that now, and it is very difficult being my own bastion of strength.  I do not crave simple encouragement; I miss having someone who I respect to really know me, and really care about my progress, and to constructively help me to get to the next level.  I felt sure that graduate school would allow me to be in a class of fellows with whom ideas could be shared and mutual inspiration could flourish.  I am wanting to be in the same boat as others who are highly capable and driven, so that the experience of trying to be a better artist can be a collective one, as it does lend itself  to seclusion, and I am far from a recluse.  I would like to find a direction, point my nose to it, and follow it for the rest of my days.  Making art all the time with no real way to share it is sort of pointless.  I am hoping to find a connection with something outside of myself that will create a current on which art and ideas can travel to and fro. I had no expectations for this program.  My decision to go here was based on proximity and provenance. In fact, its totally fair to say that my only goal when moving to Brooklyn was to attend here, (or New Paltz, before I got swallowed by Brooklyn).

    Reviews take place in two different gallery spaces over a period of two days.  Day one is second year, and day two is first year.   Full time and adjuct faculty, administrators, lab techs, and a smattering of other dignitaries shuffle back and forth between the two spaces, partaking of appetizers and coffee intermitantly.   Because of my priorities (finishing my work and my job), I was only able to make it to two second year reviews.  The first one was a roast, but the student held himself together pretty well.  The second one was all accolades.  The rooms are full of tension and excitement, and honesty abounds.  They are not here to coddle us.

      I had started on my felcan work at the beginning of the semester after it became clear to me that I could not get through this program simply cobbling together imagery that I think looks wonderful.  I took the plunge, because I have plenty of intellectual curiosity, and the message from two of my teachers was strictly focused on the development of the inquiry.  For me, this will always be secondary to the actual act of making the work -- the time spent planning it and acquiring the materials.  All of that is heaven to me.  I worked like an animal on my pieces.  I planned them months in advance.  I schlepped a great many loads of material from work to school.  I learned how to make a rubber mold and cast in plaster.  I went to shows and applied the inspiration, working larger than ever, as my studio allows for this. I dismissed sub par finished work and cut it up to make it into something better.  I took all of the advice that was given to the best of my ability.  I devoured the readings on my coffee breaks at work.  I spent money like it was the end of the world.   I slashed and burned.  I made a lot of work in a vast array of media.

The concept of the felcan was spurned by my necessity to work on many things at one time, and in all the media that my heart desires. I needed a common thread.  The felcan had originated in my head a few years ago as a good idea for a graphic novel.  Drilling deeper, it crossed my mind once that wouldn't that just be the most logical thing to do in this world of designer pets, and why has no one done that yet?  Oh! ...because its impossible.   The story line brewed in my psyche, and was mentioned to few. I imagined the felcan to be a very static creature that instead of reacting outrageously to situations (Crash!!  Bam!!  Kaplowie!!), has situations reacting outrageously around it. And so it goes.

     On days that I decadentally took off from work, I planned my time in the room.  I was fortunate enough to be the first person in my assigned space. Unlike most rooms in the building, this one is, for some reason,  always unlocked.  I was able to spend time installing hooks and anchors etc. prior to the actual installation.  I did this after hours, when the building is ghostly quiet and all I can hear is the water dripping from a leaky faucet.   I installed the hooks on a nice slanted bit in the room.  It was really quite perfect.  The anticipated piece, entitled "Be careful Who You Call Your Heroes" (Archie quote) involved suspending the concrete cores from the ceiling.  These are heavy and the trial and error involved with attaining the look was immense.   I bought fancy jewelry-lie rigging hardware that I decided not to use because it was too obvious, and did not fit in with the concept.   I lugged a hammer drill back and forth from work to drill into the cores.   Those damned cores...I see them on jobs and have wanted to do something with them for years.  The steamfitters who cut them out of the concrete slab with hole saws and  helped me attain them often seemed to know what I meant when I tried to explain their beauty, which was heartening.

    By the way, the cores represent pedestals.  they are suspended because the felcan is looking up at them.  The suggestion is that instead of falling quickly, they are for unpredictable reasons stopped in motion, precariously...by something.  Doesn't need to be the ceiling. Heros.

     Dorothy, wonderful friend that she is, visited me one day and helped me do a test hang of the cores, and sure enough, one of the connections was faulty. I had to use concrete anchors which do not come with an eye hook, so I had to tightly wind tie wire around the head of the stud and fortify it with Loctite, but the wire had to be very carefully and tightly wound.  I was so grateful for the help.  It started to feel like a curse that I want to do this thing so badly.

 


 
    I  had to have some broken pieces of concrete, so I located perfect bits in a walled off yard on campus which I invaded and left with my booty--garbage to anyone else; a complete treasure to me.

   I was able to hang "Birth" (below)  because a sweet classmate was on hand to help me at the 11th hour.  I could not have done it without her.  This piece has its own epic story involving me fighting my way through it.  Schluffing off naysayers.  Believing in the vision.  I adore this piece because of the journey that lead to its fruition, and oddly, I am very pleased with its funny looks.

 
     Building the form for this polyesther resin piece was no small feat.  Dealing with shop tech was trying at first, but in the end, I would have accidentally destroyed it were it not for him.  Several failed lighting attempts--still working on that.  Those flowers are lovingly painted with water color, and have push pins for stamens. The leaves, the tendrils, so much attention to detail.  This is not a boast; it is just the first time I have ever done anything like this!   I loved every second of it.  When shoptek saw finished piece in my studio, he told me that he was worried that the rest of my work would look be similar to this piece, which he stated, "looks like he could buy it at k-mart".

    The installation was complete Thurs night, and I was ready for my turn.  Exhausted, relieved, relaxed, unflappable.  I did my best.

 

    Yesterday, Friday, the first student to get reviewed, a fellow I am friendly with was late and in a frenzied state when he arrived.  He had been entirely MIA the previous day, so I was worried.  His work, I think, is gorgeous.  However, the audience was not impressed.  He did not have enough work to show them.  It was distressing and cautionary to see my friend in that position.  

      When my turn came, I was oddly calm considering my usual public speaking anxiety.   I was too tired to care.  One person who I do not know asked me which piece I thought was the most successful.  I floundered, but I wished I would have suggested the below piece.  


    The Grad Deputy fancied a leaf tacked I  to an x-ray as an afterthought. She said some other stuff that did not compute because I was derailed by this. How could such a small peripheral detail be noteworthy?   She said something about how if I wanted to write a story, I would not be in the art department.  I don't know.  Its all lost.   Someone said something about liking the work that was "less work".  This is useless to me, because I enjoy spending a lot of time on my work and am not really in the business of pumping it out.  Several people commented on installation potential, and its identity as a beginning.  Archie said some nice things that I do not remember; he likes to see a lot of work.   One person commented that I can spend the rest of my career working on just this project which made me feel warm.  Masters Thesis teacher asked, "Why are you doing this?" I am doing it because I am interested in sharing my work, but if he has to ask why, that leaves me very confused. .  He kindly spoke about the story.  It was nice to hear it recounted from someone else, but I could not decipher in what spirit it was relayed.   The rest of the conversation rotated around the narrative.  Another fellow I do not recognize said something about an artist who walked around with a suitcase full of art that he "curated". I have no idea what I was supposed to get from that.  I wish I felt connected to somebody in the program enough to get perspective on what happened in there.  I blabbed a little about "the ultimate non-rhetorical question".  I went on a tangent about limits.  No one wants to hear me talk.  Wish i could escape that part with every bone in my body, but I also think I secretly love it. Eto had good words for me about turning every piece into more pieces.   I would like to know more about what he means.  I was glad I focused on satisfying myself during the making of the work, as this mentality carried me through the semester, and especially during the reviews. .  

      I can make art that is satisfying to me anywhere. So why am I there?  What am I getting out of it? It's something, but whatever it is will be revealed in time.  I am there for feedback, which has been somewhat available. The financial sacrifice is daunting.   The stress of having to choose between work and school so often -- intense.  I feel like I am falling short all around.  I have little time for life management like grocery shopping and laundry, and forget about a social life.   No one at my job knows about the effort involved with school, and vice versa.   Two different worlds!   I have received criticism from some about not being at school more for the extracurriculars. I have been warned at work about "watching my time", and if I lose this job, it will be sad.  There is a Lord of the Flies, every man for himself vibe at BC that is dumb and strange, and seems to stem from insecurity.  Is that normal for art grad school?  Maybe it is!

   I learned that one second year student has been making art that is reflecting some inner turmoil with the use of pornographic imagery.  He made a lot of work to this effect, and got lambasted in reviews.  How did it get that far?  Did he receive warnings and ignore them? I heard he left that day feeling disgraced.  So he must not have known what he had coming.  Is it possible that he was neglected?  Did no one say anything about the difficulty in receiving his work?  It was said in behind closed doors that he was working stuff out in his art that he should be working out in therapy.   Again, this is cautionary.  The second year student who received the accolades was asked if he had any questions for the group.  He asked, in slightly broken English and with a hushed laugh, "Is it good?"  Everyone in the room laughed, because we all know that is the million dollar question.  

Monday, December 3, 2018

Wings

Evolution of Wings   

-Decent with modification
-sameness 





Tuesday, November 27, 2018

Sapiens



     According to Sapiens, by Yuval Noah Harari, we didn't domesticate wheat.  Wheat domesticated us.  The first crop was wheat, and the first people to decide to give up their nomadic lifestyle in lieu of predictable weather, favorable location, and a lot less schlepping were rewarded with many children. By the time they got around to checking in with the Jones's to see how things were going with the hunting and gathering, it was too late to join in the fun, because their families were too big to tag along.  The agricultural revolution. 


Patricia Puccini/Hans Bellmer






Back in early October, at a New Lab Open House party, Eleanor and I got started on the topic of biomorphic humanoid forms in art. She dropped a very important name: Hans Bellmer. German.  Worked in the mid 30s.  He is known for photography involving dolls. I found his work of great note. 







I wanted to counter with a mentioning of Patricia Piccinni whose work I encountered in Chelsea years ago:






But before I could do so, we were distracted by the beauty of this:

Jason Krugman Studio

Saturday, November 24, 2018

People Who Have Helped /Eye

     


         

           The other day, I was walking down the Malcolm X blvd thinking about the felcan, and about how it is emerging as a creature under observation.  I was musing to myself about what a scientist may want to observe about the felcan.  I came up with two answers; its flesh and its eye.  I had acquired a while back a stack of ugly linoleum tiles which looks vaguely fleshy. 

I walked past a fenced off empty lot, and saw this:

 After doing some detective work, I was able to find the whereabouts of the building super from his wife,   whose daughter, the next day,  gave me access to the yard, and was only too happy to let me have what to her, was garbage. They  had no idea how happy they made me! 
I am currently in the process of cutting the linoleum into "scales" and screwing them into this fiberglass form. 

Monday, November 12, 2018

The felcan's progress...


A short Photo Essay

For more artist statement and prologue (the story of the felcan), go here: felcan

"The Felcan's Spring" in Progress
The Felcan's Spring nearly done.  Turns out, lighting will be key to making this piece work. LEDs in the mail!
It became apparent I was going to need a model.  







The felcan- a study


Mold-making expertise furnished by Kim Couchot. 

A felcan x-ray in front of "The Girlfriend"

More mold-making expertise....this time furnished by a friend I met at Craftsman Artist Supply,  Logan Wall.  I was in there enough times getting mold-making advice!


So excited about this next phase!

A short crappy video from Open Studios, where it all started to come together...maximize for full effect. 





Marcel Dzama/ Ralph Bakshi

 



Marcel Dzama is an artist that was recommended to me during one of our group critiques.  I was told to look for his work on instagram, as a lot of it is deliberately undocumented by the artist.  I was able to find plenty about him on-line and listened to a podcast by Zwirner Gallery, which represents him.

  The anachronistic aspect, the cast of characters, and a general underpinning of mischief are of note.   He works in a mind-boggling array of media, which is inspiring at this time, when I oddly find myself open to working in installation, performance, and possibly "social scultpture".  The idea of interactivity has taken on a rich meaning, especially after these newly present opportunities to incorporate viewer responses into the evolution of the work.

Paul C. sent me a link for Paul Bakshi, an animator.  He speaks to cartoons and fantasy, and the far-reaching capacity of animation beyond the domain of children.  Paul also knows a simple way of making animation that sounds way too labor intensive, but I would love to learn how to execute this method he described.

I am too immersed in casting now to even think about another medium at the moment!

Open Studios


Things People referenced while viewing my work...


  • Edgar Allen Poe...the BFAs. His short story, The Cask of Amontillado.  Which lead to discussion of "darkness".  We discussed the complexities of pinning down this concept.  We talked about monsters and demons in the work of Hieronymous Bosch, whose name ellicited cooing of approval from BFAs. 






  • Tim Burton....Spencer, one of the BFAs.  Also in my Wakanda class, he shares a space with the bubbly BFA girls, and speaks so thoughtfully.  We talked about the dog who is a character in the Nightmare Before Christmas, who lives a "cursed existence, but does not know it"-a comparison to the felcan.


                                       


  • Ralph Steadman...Jenn McCoy.  I had to respond that he is way up there in my pantheon of inspirations.  


                                         

  • Catdog -- This cartoon was brought to my attention by two people now.  I checked it out, and see the correlation.  The animation is abysmal and the storyline is profane, but here you go.  



  • Eduardo Kac's genetically engineered glow-in-the-dark bunny. Brought up by a late-coming straggler.  Learning about him was accompanied by a conversation about the importance of knowing artists who are doing work in the same vein.  Eduardo Kac's work in transgenesis I find interesting in its allusion to evolution.  The assumption that humanity in all of its abortive glory would control evolution seems inevitable.  I would not call this art, however, as the artistic imperative mandates a companionable and non-hierarchical stance concerning animals.  


Topics that came up...

Eggs...and how they are not male or female, just a "becoming" -- .a faculty member. She saw eggs in my Ben Wah ball piece. I restrained myself from naming the piece to her and asserting  the connection between sex toys and fertility.

Rayograms....Ed Cuppola, a faculty member, and our safety consultant. 

"darkness" 

"Does the felcan feel pain?"  --MJ, from my Collaborative Studies class.  I responded yes, and referenced the importance of this concept as explained by David Foster Wallace in Consider the Lobster. 

"I was really worried." -- Steve Keltner, on the extension cord piece.  "I like a lot of your work, but that thing looks like I could buy it at K-Mart".






Saturday, November 3, 2018

Dale Williams



     I had the pleasure of meeting Dale Williams' work at the opening party for Gowanus Open Studios.  The vast space was all but covered with his charcoal and paper works. Many of them approaching mural size, they were impressive against the white washed brick interior.  His work deals in characters, narrative, and history. Dale is a graduate of Hunter College, and has been working in this Brooklyn community for over 25 years.  I enjoyed the sketcherly quality of the finished works and noted their power, despite the presence of color-all of the emphasis placed on the stark graphic quality of the black and white. 


Here's a great write up on him and his studio on Douglas Street.  Dale Williams



Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Ugly Aesthetic

October 24

    I am thinking about ugly. The "ugly aesthetic" came up when learning about Kathe Kollowitz.  She included the images of the less fortunate at a time when it was not fashionable.

     Beauty is historically a signifier of truth, virtue, and the sublime. Ugly suggests evil, unrest, bad character, and deformity.  Kathe Kollowitz's Unemployed (1925) a wood-cut print, depicts the faces of the impoverished- the gaunt faces and sagging skin.  Kollowitz shows their ugliness as a call to action, as it inspires pity and represents injustice.




      Ugly makes you want to turn away, but it also fascinates.  Grotesque is a related term which  has a psychological suggestion.  Its as if the ugliness has somehow traversed the barrier of your flesh, and is burrowing inside of you, imitating a reflection of your bloody mushy insides.  I would argue that what constitutes ugly or grotesque, is shared by all humans, and it is only the way we respond to it that varies from culture to culture.

      The human standard for ugly seems to be different between the animate and the inanimate. For instance, humans pan-culturally appreciate texture in clothing and art.  Polk dots and stripes. When those qualities, however, appear on human flesh such as in the case of an aging face, the liverspots and creases that accompany us into our twilight years, mark the cessation of youthful beauty.  Asymmetry is beautiful in design but works terrible for a person's face.





Felcan update:

Found someone to help me with rubber mold.  Trying to make it uglier.

Sill haven't been able to get Spring out of the mold, but should have that done by tomorrow.  Fingers crossed.

Found plaque for taxidermied head.

Started My Mother was a Dancer.






Sunday, October 21, 2018

Matthew Barney/Dream Logic

 October 21



"Objects and narrative acting together"..I remember going to see the Cremaster Exhibition at the Guggenheim, and  being floored by the artistry involved with the "props", although that is clearly not the right word.  The peices ranged from blue Astroturf to plastics and resins in drip formations, these items relating to each other with a sort of "dream logic", as was described by another onlooker. 


Barney's epic Cremaster Cycle (1994-2002) was a project consisting of five feature-length films that explore processes of creation.  Barney's vision encompasses a wide variety of media, including video and performance. His influences include Jack Smith, Norman Mailer, and Bruce Nauman.

I share with Barney the compulsion to eradicate gender, or even identity as a human.  A character that is not a being. 

So what does that make it, a prop?  I am talking in current work about the felcan traverses a world of animate and inanimate representations.  Through this, systems of presence can be devised.  There appears to be a tendency to pair the non-being character in a world that is not our own.  Then there are artists who created monsters, demons, fictitious characters, used animals, ....never personification of animals until recent times.  Makes me think about how Disney characters are as much like humans as they could possibly be before becoming human. 

All of this speaks enticingly to that dream logic.  The trick is to humanize it.   (Thank you, Archie)



Felcan update:


completed Spring this weekend, despite many obstacles. Pic Forthcoming...

Wednesday, October 17, 2018

The Mechanicals




Rube Goldberg.



 Arthur Ganson
artichoke petal



The Seemen



Survival Research Lab (Kal Spelltich.)

T.H.E.R.M. West Oakland Artist Collective





Talmudic Format

I am posting a message and response between myself and a prof.  I find this all to be very useful ...
information....First my message, and his response. 


Hello!  I just want to mention that it occurred to me today how fortunate my art generation is to have your art generation to inform us.  As I think I may have mentioned to you, my dear friend/mentor, Susan Josepher, alumni of Brooklyn College, was on hand to explain the so-called "importance" of Abstract Expressionism during my art pubescence. "You just had to be there'" she said.  And now I get it!  Its the zeitgeist.  

When I was asking, "Whats next?" It was more a philosophical question than an art question.  Does not art reflect the spirit of the times?  I am wondering from your perspective, what this may be, and more broadly, I am trying to conceptualize what it actually is. 

Post Modern philosophy is very interesting.  To the extent of my knowledge, there is a huge emphasis on the "meta".  Vice Versa.  Irony.  The snake eating its tail.  We live in a time when art shapes our existence as much as our existence generates art. 



RESPONSE:


Thanks for the feedback. Feel free to share this note with your colleagues if you like.  

I have never seen a great work of art that is primarily ironic.  Not Goya's royal portraits or any of Warhol's work... and Hogarth is (a) not great and (b) more moralistic than ironic.  

If examined even cursorily it is OBVIOUS that great art, from any culture, is HUMANIST and presented with and by AFFECTION.   All of these titles and philosophies muddy the waters of what artists actually do and are injected into aesthetic conversations by impotent observers who seek the power of quashing the fluidity that I showed operating in the work of Eva Hesse and setting up a "contextualizing" perimeter over which they claim authorship.  Greenberg and Rosenberg actually fought over whether New York based artists of the 40's-50's should be called "action painters" or "abstract expressionists".  

Aesthetic philosophizing is a pissing contest with all of those puerile motives in tact.  Barney Newman was by no means an "abstract expressionist" nor was Eva Hesse a "minimalist".  The French, offended at New York for taking the temporary spotlight, came up with all these assholes that you are now required to read - 40 to 50 years after their initial pronouncements and are now calcified in the curriculum of universities whose observational capacities are glacially slow to shed any of their safe encrustations.   

Derrida's "Jewish" "talmudic" formatting I sometimes think is a sadly pugilistic response to the iconoclasm, the weakness, the lack of the visual, in Judaism.  Forget the "meta" and the "essentialist" crap.  What I've been showing all semester, and will continue to show, is that what artists do is actually CONTRARY to what the cultural analysts say we do....and they say that after the fact so they can neatly stack their assumptions into a container and neutralize all of the IRRATIONAL and PURELY VISUAL (not verbal) INTELLECTUALISM that happens in the MYSTERY of the art that deeply moves us.  Some people just can't stand a MYSTERY.   They must WIN.  They must kill the MYSTERY - like Penn and Teller - so that we KNOW.  The enduring value of art is that we never know and keep asking, which keeps us ALIVE.

The reason that Louise Bourgeois, Sol Lewitt, Dan Flavin and Carl Andre and Eva Hesse and Smithson the Earthworks guys are interesting and the reason the Donald Judd bores the crap out of me is that Donald Judd was an ART CRITIC and explained his approach, justifying his work with the relief of his finite theories.  The same goes for Ad Reinhardt about whom I couldn't care less.  

Mondrian's paint, when examined up close, looks like cream cheese, which defies all the "purity" of neo-plasiticism......WHY  did he paint THAT  way?  I've never read a critic address the incongruity of his paint handling with his compositions - but he was Jackson Pollock's great champion with Peggy Guggenheim.  Go figure.  

The reason that my oldest friend, Larry Poons, keeps painting in a way that has lost all critical support and whose work is "out of fashion" but still greatly admired by painters is something that the critical dialogue would simply not deal with rather than examine.  

Irony is bullshit.  It is a shield against the courage to be vulnerable and therefore be accessible, to provide the generosity of nutrition, by taking the stance of received information and illustrating it for a timid public that wants emblems of what it is already told to believe.  All the best,

Botched Anatomy/Mark Dion



    In The Postmodern Animal, by Steve Baker, I encountered the concept of "botched taxidermy".  After investigating examples of these and reading about the multidimensional meanings constructed by creating something that does not already exist.  The practice is usually that of those experienced in taxidermy.

    Steve Baker explained in The Postmodern Animal: “A botched taxidermy piece might be defined as referring to the human and to the animal, without itself being either human or animal, and without its being a direct representation of either. It is an attempt to think a new thing…Neither species, nor genus, nor individual, each one is open both to endless interpretation and, more compellingly still, to the refusal of interpretation…They are perhaps things with which to think, rather than themselves being things to be thought about…"


Here is a piece of literature available on the subject.

http://www.johnisaacs.net/press_files/ANTENNAE_7_2008.pdf

Examples of botched taxidermy...they get pretty weird..




It is noteworthy that Mark Dion received honorable mention in Baker's book, and also was a recent guest artist speaker at school.  I was thunderstruck by his fabricated relics, and presentations. 

Installation.  Huh.

Here is the pic of the current felcan prototype.  The answer to all your questions is...yes.

h

Monday, October 15, 2018

Pothole/ Institutional Critique





   Adventures in Not Really Knowing for Sure

  


photo by Bob Szantyr
     Today, I failed to cast a pot hole in plaster.  This was almost going to happen in front of some BFAs, but due to lack of communication, and security heft, it did not happen.  Pick taken by 2nd year student..a very sweet fellow.  

Little piles of asphalt


   Also,  I learned about "institutional art"   Joseph Beuys is the heavy hitter in this genre, among others.  It usually involves art institutions, but in broader sense, couldn't anything institutional-feeling be criticized?  Am I allowed to make these sorts of leaps?  
   


Monday, October 8, 2018

"Final" artist statement/Introducing the felcan






Artist Statement
   
            Thank you in advance for taking the time to read this; your close attention means a lot to me.

My work explores the intersection of experimentation and discovery, and the mechanics of choice.  We live in a time and place where most seems known. Beyond the realm of science or language lurks that which cannot be known by either, but is palpable nonetheless. These mysteries reveal themselves through the dialogue between living things and their environments. Using scientific discovery as a metaphor for the experience of discovery in general,  the work explores the hidden messages within and without, and the decisions that ensue.


In this series, I am telling you a story.  While some stories are told through books or word-of-mouth, this one is told through a serialized body consisting of disparate works that are like panels in a dimensional graphic novel. These are called ‘episodes’ and are not meant to follow a strict sequence.  The pieces represent a variety of media, from dot matrix to 12 ton shackles. Language and meaning range from Sumerian to maledicta, and implied to abandoned.

Working in this way enables me to invent scenarios and encounters with which I can experiment freely and remain open to the next discovery.    I am thinking about how a being is influenced by its surroundings and also with meaning making. It is my hope, that a viewer who reads and looks carefully will be rewarded.  Part of my process is to incorporate observations of the work by others. In this way, the work is very much a collaboration between me and my environment, which accounts for the presence of found materials and objects.


Thank you



Prologue

The Felcan


         There once  lived a greedy scientist who thought he would get rich if he bred the world's cutest dog with the world's cutest cat.  He set about to do this, and it became his life's work. The research and experimentation involved with this undertaking was nothing short of ungodly. After failed attempts resulting in litters of half-baked fetuses that were ugly even for fetuses, the female became pregnant again with a promising new litter of specimens. Sonograms and amniocenteses were all showing fully developed healthy offspring with all the probable signs of affectionate loyal dispositions and delicate little features that would surely be irresistable to pet-lovers. At the time of these experiments, the scientist became very ill, and shortly before passing, he left in his will the company which owned the patent on this exciting new hybrid, to his only son.

       The son cared little for the wealth or the headaches involved with running the company, but figured he would hold onto it until the arrival of the litter, for no particular reason. Excitement buzzed throughout the the halls of the research facility, and the staff twittered through their routines- performing tests, recording data, and attending to the needs of the super-pregnant female.

       When the female finally came to term, based on digital imaging, a litter of seven was expected. However once her uterus had spasmodically heaved forth its contents, not seven, but one—one lumpen specimen was to be seen! Had it consumed its womb-mates? The researchers peered at the creature, glistening with fluids, and before they could get around to checking its vital signs, they examined it closely for signs of cuteness. The thing was hardly symmetrical. It was more hairless than one would expect either a puppy or a kit. The hair, not being completely absent, but occurred sporadically in thin tufts. But it was alive! And healthy! And they called it the felcan.


     The research staff struggled to reconcile their climactic anticipation with the abortive outcome, and went back to work on cloning aliens. The son estranged himself from the company, but he brought the felcan home. He went about his business, and the felcan stayed out of his way, mostly lingering idly under the couch and surviving only by dint of a complete absence of will.


    The son and the girlfriend came to know the felcan's deficiencies. It cannot hear. Its incipient ear canal closed over like a wound shortly after birth. The felcan makes no utterance, but the it can see well. Like many creatures who suffered from a dimness of one faculty, its others strove to compensate. The felcan's heinously mismatched and seemingly vacuous eyes were uncannily adept at taking in the world around it. They processed the raw data of vision through the gloriously scrambled matrix of its optic nerve. You see, the felcan did not eat its siblings. They had died in utero, and the remaining felcan had absorbed the uber-nutrients from their remains, which has been known to happen.  This is how it became a biological marvel, capable of astral projection, time travel, and incredibly, the felcan is indestructible and has no telemeres on its nerve endings, so it does not age.


     Although the felcan had an amphibious way of standing about inertly, it possessed no lizard brain whatsoever. No fight. No flight. The felcan simply responded to pretty much anything simply by observation. The only thing that kept it alive, was good fortune, and random safety precautions that were meant for other living things. The felcan was not dumb, in fact, it was quite intelligent. It was just not capable of responding to stimuli in a way that made sense to others.

    Once, well, several times, the felcan died. During one such seizure, an ambitious erstwhile lab attendant was able to download imagery directly from the felcan's brain, and recreate a semblance of these images, but the results were fractious and cryptic, their descriptions defying technology. It turned out that the felcan was sometimes able to remove its own gaze to outside its corpus, and observe itself...observing.

   As science observes the felcan, it strives to co-opt that property that allows the felcan to detach its spirit from its meatbag body; an endeavor that is likely futile.  








Transition

October 9....

    I started today in the bowels of LIRR just north of Grand Central.  Twenty-two flights of stairs down, and then up again at the end of the day.   Its dark, dusty, and cavernous.   The guys are great, and hopefully the company will keep me in spite of the unusual schedule.  Just a few weeks ago, I was nesting in the Observation deck at Hudson Yards, 1200 feet in the air, eagerly awaiting a change.  Fortunately, I  had a chance to say so-long to Johnny P.  Actually, I said, "see you down the road", because that is what we say to each other.  What a treasure of a human being. I will miss his wisdom and his warmth.

    Its odd processing these changes.  I work side by side with someone, day after day for more than two years, and then "poof".  In my Journey to Wakanda class, we learned about the Toureg, nomandic African tribes who customarily cover themselves in protective layers of indigo and in the shade of a tent from evil spirits during times of transition.  This resonates greatly with me, as this transitional time has left me vulnerable to strange feelings.

I had to get my hustle on to renew some licenses.  I took the suspended scaffold refresher class. I was so glad to see Gene M, who will always be the person who introduced me to 580 at the Freedom tower 7 years ago.  Johnny Rock is retiring, and I was thrilled to get some time catching up a little.  My gratitude to 580 is immense, as I would not be able to do what I am doing now without it.

Hudson yards was a wild ride, fraught with challenge.  I have to say, I had a great time. 

Sunday, October 7, 2018

First Critique/Sarah Sze/Lee Bontecou



     Our first critique was on Tuesday.  I left work on Monday, stopped home for a few hours to do what I needed to do, then went to school with the intention of starting in the evening and working all through the night, which I did.  Having twenty four hour access is a windfall; it plugs me into my favorite thing--being able to haunt places. I have always taken pleasure in being someplace that is not my dwelling, where I have somehow been granted access , even if it was granted to me by myself, where I am (mostly) alone, and where I feel like I am haunting the place like a ghost at all hours of night.  The campus becomes more lovely to me with every passing day, but it is at night, when the ground flowers are softly backlit , and the grass and buildings are so beautifully maintained, the asphalt walkways have no cracks, and its quiet quiet quiet...

      I worked all night and completed these pieces. When I showed Susan J.  the Yellow Building, she said it was too literal, so I de-literalized it.  I began and mostly completed this piece, called....I worked in a collaging frenzy until it was time for class.  I didn't even brush my teeth or put on makeup.  It felt wonderful, and when my classmates started coming in before class to their own studios, I was genuinely glad to see them.  I had done enough work, that even if the critiques went bad, it was not for lack of trying.

     Professor Eto was first.  We spend a half hour on everyone, and it was thrilling to see what people had been working on.  All good work.  I was last, and the first thing Eto said was, "this seems like it should be an installation."  My memory always becomes a blur when it involves public speaking, but I spoke a lot about what I had made, and Eto responded,   "it seems like you are not doing what you want to be doing".   Mike S. said, I bet that pile of metal under the table means more to you than any of these drawings.  I told them both that they were right.  I knew it was not a negation of the value of the work I'd made at all. 

     Then I had my crit with Archie.  Again I was last.  I was late because I had run off campus to buy a cigarette and junkfood.  It was raining hard and the sun was down.   The elevator too the 5th floor was slow, and stood there in the blindingly white hallway waiting for clunky thing to come.  When I got to my studio, there was Archie.  He was going through everything, my sketches, my portfolios.  "Where are you from?" he asked.  He keyed into my issues with place.  The white background.  The lack of horizon line.  The facility I have with placing figures and objects in space.  He said my compositions were reminiscent of those who had been disenfranchised.   Then he went on a bit about women and how THEY have always been marginalized.   I kept my mouth shut, but silently revolted.  Our conversation was about "place" and he told me to give this some thought, and he left.

Bushwick open Studios


I was fortunately dislodged from my apartment by art gang to go to Bushwick open studios this Saturday.  What a great couple of hours.  I am so lucky to have my friend, Eleanor, who although not an artist herself, is a relentless appreciator of the arts, and a tireless sender of emails about local events.  Here are some highlights: 

Nick Greenwald—Walls covered with intricate graphite drawings. Human charactaes with bulging eyes and forced perspective. Complex intricate compositions with the details in the background so detailed and minute, I had to wonder how he accomplished it. But the real treat was further in the back...tiles of venetian plaster coated in many layers of graphite and polished to a high sheen...some burnished with wax, so that they shone with a mesmerizing steely luster. He was generous with descriptions of his process and answered all our many questions. Figures the best artist of the day is the one that has no website.


Dwightcassin.com --Before going into Dwight's studio, we discussed the etiquette involved with walking into an artists private space and what the interaction should be like. I felt a little guilty about treating the last few like galleries.  The artists are right there and part of the experience is to interact with them.  Dwight's work features wooden biomorphic assemblages embellished with “pin nails”. We loved their colorful playfulness, and the four of us sat and chatted with him for a bit. 

Another artist, Hunter Renolds, makes art about living through the aids epidemic in the 80s. Although postcards fanned out on a table showed him in his early years, a handsome, young, and brazenly wearing a tutu on the steps of the nyc public library . He said Giuliani made nudity legal for the day, knowing the gays would be doing it anyway, and didn't want to be bothered with policing them. The man in front of us, however, had a  disfigured face. His nose appeared to have completely come off and had been reattached as a twisted  band of flesh that was fastened to his forehead. You could see openings in his face where it had come unattached. We barely noticed though, because we were enjoying his banter and his encaustic art, which was of special interest to us since we had just taken the encaustic workshop for my birthday. 


@heajungpaints

@heajungpaints